Helena Lyng Blak
2 weeks ago

“A severe blow to the ideals of democracy”: The Supreme Court rules on voting rights case

US Supreme Court upholds redistricting accused of racial gerrymandering in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.
Photo by DarioStudios
Photo by DarioStudios

On Thursday, May 23, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision to reverse a federal court’s unanimous findings that South Carolina’s 2021 congressional map was a case of racial gerrymandering and thus unconstitutional and in need of being redrawn. 

Before 2020, South Carolina’s congressional District 1 was seemingly a ‘swing-district’, with Democrats and Republicans going neck and neck in each election, frequently only winning their seats by small margins.

Following the 2020 Census, changes and shifts in population required states to redraw their congressional districts. 

South Carolina redrew its maps, dividing the county of Charleston between two different districts. The cities of Charleston and North Charleston were placed within a sixth district with the state’s Midlands region, which is located 100 miles away from the latter of the two cities. This, according to the League of Women Voters, fundamentally changed the racial makeup of the congressional districts.

The plaintiffs argued the redistricting violated the Fifteenth and Fourteenth Amendments’ Equal Protection Clause as it divided Black communities and thus voters. The defendants, on the other hand, claimed that the map was an example of partisan gerrymandering, not racial. 

It was Justice Samuel Alito who delivered the 6-3 majority opinion, saying, 

“Claims that a map is unconstitutional because it was drawn to achieve a partisan end are not justiciable in federal court. By contrast, if a legislature gives race a predominant role in redistricting decisions, the resulting map is subjected to strict scrutiny and may be held unconstitutional.”

In her dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that, 

“The State contends that its mapmakers looked exclusively at data from the last election and targeted people who had voted Democratic. If that is true, the State’s actions (however unsavory and undemocratic) are immune from federal constitutional challenge. The Challengers, though, offer a different account. They say that the mapmakers, not content with what the election data revealed, also reviewed and heavily relied on racial data— thus exploiting the well-known correlation between race and voting behavior.”

Many NGOs and voting rights organizations have reacted to the Supreme Court decision with anger and frustration. 

Janette McCarthy-Wallace, Chief General Counsel of the NAACP, called the decision “a severe blow to the ideals of democracy.”

Maya Wiley, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement that the decision, in her opinion, is an “egregious and blatant assault on the rights of Black voters,” and an “atrocious move by an ideologically conservative majority to install its own ideological views about voting rights—views that are hostile to history and hostile to the Constitution.”


The information provided by this Site is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information on the Site.

More News

5 hours ago Federal Reserve Sees Progress on Inflation, Adjusts Rate Cut Expectations The Federal Reserve has adjusted its forecast for rate cuts this year, citing persistent inflation despite recent progress. High borrowing costs are expected to linger, impacting consumers and the broader economy.
6 hours ago Bitcoin Holds Steady as Fed Maintains Interest Rates: A Sign of Economic Caution In a cautious move, the U.S. Federal Reserve opted to keep interest rates unchanged, causing Bitcoin to hold its ground. Read more about the economic implications and market responses here: "The Committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals have moved toward better balance over the past year."
9 hours ago High-Stakes Showdown: Tesla Shareholders Decide on Elon Musk’s $56B Pay Package Tesla shareholders are set to cast their votes on Elon Musk's controversial $56 billion compensation package, a decision that could have far-reaching consequences for the company.
12 hours ago USDMXN: A Golden Opportunity USDMXN: A Golden Opportunity Amid Mexican Election Sell-Off, Says Steno Research Analyst
1 day ago EU's New Tariffs on Chinese EVs Hit Tesla and BYD Stocks! Tesla (TSLA) and BYD (1211) Stocks Plummet After EU Tariff Announcement
1 day ago Macro Mondays: Escaping the TRAP of Sideways Markets Andreas Steno, Mikkel Rosenvold And Mads Eberhardt talk macro and crypto
1 day ago EU launches trade war with China In a bold move that has sent ripples through global markets, the European Union has effectively launched a trade war against China. This decision, announced just three days after the European Parliament elections, raises significant questions about the influence and timing of the EU’s legislative body.
1 day ago July Bloodbath: Metals Set for Major Crash? Brace yourselves for a tumultuous July in the metals market! Industry experts are sounding the alarm as cluster risks in metals like gold, silver, and copper threaten a significant downturn. Here's why July could spell disaster for metal investors.
1 day ago 5 Stories To Invest in for Emerging Markets 5 Stories that might interest you if you're into investing in Emerging Markets